dc.contributor.author |
Degbor, C.K |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-17T14:51:37Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-17T14:51:37Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2014 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://41.74.91.244:8080/handle/123456789/1240 |
|
dc.description |
A THESIS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, FACULTY OF
SCIENCE EDUCATION, SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF GRADUATE
STUDIES, IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, WINNEBA IN PARTIAL
FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR AWARD OF THE MASTER OF
PHILOSOPHY DEGREE IN SCIENCE EDUCATION DEGREE.
JULY, 2014 |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
The study sought to investigate the effect of Student-Teams-Achievement-Division
Cooperative Learning (STAD CL) as against Individual Learning (IL) on Senior High
School (SHS) chemistry students’ understanding of the concept of hybridization. It also
aimed at finding out the effect of CL on their attitude and motivation as well as
establishing their perception with regards to IL, STAD CL and benefits of CL. The study
also sought the views of students on which of the modes of instructions (CL or IL) they
would prefer as main mode of teaching at the SHS. Two control groups (class sizes 12
and 25) totalling 37 and two treatment groups (class sizes 14 and 31) totalling 45 were
used. The study design was quasi-experimental, non-randomised pretest-intervention -
postest control group design. Four instruments which include worksheets and lesson notes
on the concept of hybridization; Achievement Test on the Concept of Hybridization
(ATCH 1 & 2); Questionnaire on Students’ Attitude and Motivation (QSAM); and
Questionnaire on Students Perception about Peer Cooperation (QSP) in CL and IL were
used. The results showed a significant difference between the group taught with the
STAD CL and the group taught with IL (f = 78.722, p < 0.05) on the Analysis of
Covariance (ANCOVA) Table (10) with a medium effect size of 0.36. A slight
improvement in attitude and motivation towards the subject was also observed. Mean
difference on pre and post treatment QSAM for CL group was 4.93 and that for IL group
was 1.03. On the post-treatment QSP scale, means for perception of STAD CL (12.09)
and its benefits (20.51) was more favourable than perception of IL (8.62). As to which of
CL and IL should be the main mode of instruction at the SHS, 73.3% of students
supported CL and 13.3% each either were undecided or disagreed. Based on these results
and other studies, the researcher recommends a blend of methods with more emphasis on
CL in the Ghanaian SHS which future educational reviews should make provision for. |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University Of Education,Winneba. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Understanding of hybridization |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Cooperative learning |
en_US |
dc.title |
Effect of cooperative learning on senior high school chemistry students’ understanding of hybridization |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en_US |