Abstract:
A thesis in the Department of Early Childhood Education,
Faculty of Educational Studies, submitted to the School of
Graduate Studies, in partial fulfilment
of the requirements for the award of the degree of
Master of Philosophy
(Early Childhood Education)
in the University of Education, Winneba
Description:
The purpose of the study is to investigate the Assessment Practices of Teachers in
Kindergarten Classrooms within the Nandom Municipality. The study was guided by
Sadler’s theory of assessment. The study however employed sequential explanatory
design. The study used census and simple random sampling technique to select one
hundred and twenty (120) kindergarten teachers as the sample size for the study.
Questionnaires were used to collect the quantitative data while observational check
list was used to collect the qualitative data. The quantitative data was analyzed using
frequency tables, means and standard deviations. The qualitative data was also
analyzed using frequency tables and percentages to support the quantitative data. The
study found that class exercises and test, testing (paper and pencil test) and class test
were frequently and dominantly used by kindergarten teachers in assessing students in
their classrooms. Notwithstanding these, some other assessment tools such as
portfolio building, performance of tasks and observation were also identified. In
relation to the second objective of the study which was to, “examine the perspectives
of kindergarten teachers within the Nandom municipality about the use of assessment
tools” the study found that, majority of the teachers have some level of perspective of
each measure of assessment. However, the assessment practises which kindergarten
teachers have more experience on was summative assessment followed by criterionreferenced
assessments. Formative assessment, norm-referenced assessment and
diagnostic assessments were also assessment practices they have moderate experience
on. It was found from the study that, majority of the teachers relied heavily on class
exercises and class tests, Project Work, observations and oral questions. It is therefore
recommended that, to sustain and maintain the knowledge base and skills of the
instructors in assessment methods, the Teacher Education Division within the
Nandom Municipality organize refresher courses on contemporary trends in
assessment so as to remove overreliance on some selected assessment types. The
Ministry of Education and Teacher Education Division should regularly educate
teachers on the significance of their assessment processes in order to properly
implement the assessments conducted on students. For instance, while creating a
portfolio for students, instructors must include all of the students' work rather than
just the best pieces so that parents who are invited to Parent Teacher Interaction (PTI)
sessions may be adequately informed about the growth or regression of their children.
Except for the fact that the participating instructors were unable to apply numerous
assessment tools to evaluate the students, the data point to favourable experiences
teachers have with the usage of the assessment tools. Because they may just utilize
one source of assessment tool, the instructors might not get full information on their
students as a result. Teachers are able to give appropriate feedback to students due to
their experience in assessment. The study concludes that, the teachers have some level
of perspectives of each measure of assessment. However, the most well understood
assessment practises were summative assessment followed by criterion-referenced
assessments. Formative assessment, norm-referenced assessment and diagnostic
assessments were also well understood although moderately.