UEWScholar Repository

Question markers in Sisaali

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dumah, I.B
dc.date.accessioned 2023-01-26T15:27:00Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-26T15:27:00Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.uri http://41.74.91.244:8080/handle/123456789/939
dc.description A THESIS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION, SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, WINNEBA, IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS DEGREE. JULY, 2017 en_US
dc.description.abstract This thesis examines question formation in Sɩsaalɩ, a member of the Grusi sub-group of the Gur languages (Naden 1988) spoken in the Upper West Region of Ghana and some parts of Burkina Faso. I discuss the syntax of polar, alternative and content questions. Two strategies for the formation of polar questions are identified which are the phonological and syntactic strategies. While the former involves the phonological strategy of falling intonation, the latter uses the question particles occurring either at clause initially or clause finally. The question particles are kóó and dúη which are added to declarative sentences to make them polar interrogatives. Syntactically, while kóó can occur either sentence initially or finally, dúη occurs only sentence finally. These question particles analyzed as question operators never co-occur with the intonation strategy of falling intonation. Alternative questions are also formed using the disjunctive kóó which occurs in-between the alternative in question. I thus propose that polar questions are truncated alternative questions. The formation of content questions involves both in-situ and ex-situ strategies. In the former the question words are in their base positions while in the latter, they are moved to the pre-sentential position together with the introduction of focus markers nέ, and rέ suggesting that movement of question words is really a case of focus movement. Using the Minimalist Theory I propose that in-situ strategy literally means that the uninterpretable features are weak while the ex-situ indicates that they are strong. Data was gathered from five speech communities of Paasaal. Key words: questions, focus markers, feature checking, Gur, Sɩsaalɩ en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Education,Winneba en_US
dc.subject Question markers en_US
dc.subject Sisaali en_US
dc.title Question markers in Sisaali en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UEWScholar


Browse

My Account