UEWScholar Repository

Determinants of choice of cane furniture as household commodity among the elites

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wiafe E.D.
dc.contributor.author Amoah M.
dc.contributor.author Bih F.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-31T15:05:50Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-31T15:05:50Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.issn 9731385
dc.identifier.uri http://41.74.91.244:8080/handle/123456789/564
dc.description Wiafe, E.D., Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Presbyterian University College, P. O. Box 393, Akropong-Akuapem, Ghana; Amoah, M., College of Technology Education, University of Education, P. O. Box 1277, Winneba, Kumasi, Ghana; Bih, F., College of Technology Education, University of Education, P. O. Box 1277, Winneba, Kumasi, Ghana en_US
dc.description.abstract This study evaluated the choice of people with higher level of formal education on cane furniture in Southern Ghana to provide information that could guide decisions of manufacturers and marketers of furniture. Data were collected using structured questionnaires administered on 712 selected respondents between June and August, 2013. The respondents were chosen from educated people with highest qualification ranging from HND to PhD levels. The questionnaire structured with rating scale of importance, excellent to poor ranking and strongly agreed to strongly disagreed statements on issues concerning factors that determine the choice of furniture in general and cane furniture to be specific. The results indicate that about 93% of the respondents considered the durability of the furniture material as paramount factor before they purchase it. But in terms of cane furniture, respondents ranked naturalness of the material first, secondly by attractiveness before durability as third among other factors. Kendal's coefficient of concordance indicated significant differences in the factors that determine the choice of cane furniture. The significance of the attributes that determine the choice of cane furniture varied according to the gender, age, highest education, programme of study and net salary level. The results support recommendation of adding value to and promotion of non-timber forest products and lesser known furniture materials. � 2014, CESER Publications. en_US
dc.publisher CESER Publications en_US
dc.subject Cane furniture en_US
dc.subject Commodity en_US
dc.subject Household en_US
dc.subject Non-timber forest products en_US
dc.title Determinants of choice of cane furniture as household commodity among the elites en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UEWScholar


Browse

My Account