UEWScholar Repository

Blending traditionalism with legalism: a typology of understanding corporate governance systems in Ghanaian Family-owned businesses (FOBs) from a Bourdieusian perspective

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Agyenim-Boateng C.
dc.contributor.author Iddrisu S.
dc.contributor.author Otieku J.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-31T15:05:03Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-31T15:05:03Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.issn 20436238
dc.identifier.other 10.1108/JFBM-07-2022-0096
dc.identifier.uri http://41.74.91.244:8080/handle/123456789/204
dc.description Agyenim-Boateng, C., Department of Accounting, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana; Iddrisu, S., Department of Accounting, University of Education Winneba, Winneba, Ghana; Otieku, J., Department of Accounting, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose: This paper aims to examine the nature of corporate governance systems in Ghanaian Family-owned Businesses (FOBs). Specifically, the study investigates the nature of boardroom decisions structures, sources of governance regulations and family roles in corporate governance. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on Bourdieusian perspectives of the field, capital, habitus and doxa, a case study design is used to gather detailed insights about the phenomena. Purposively, the study conducts 20 interviews with participants from 15 FOBs in Ghana. The interview data are complemented with secondary sources, such as FOB handbooks, website information, legal documents and scriptures. Subsequently, data gathered were thematically analysed. Findings: The study finds that human actors blended traditionally tacit and legally expressed boardroom decisions structures in FOBs governance. Again, traditional values, social acceptance of religious sociology and regulatory frameworks of the field dictate corporate governance practices in FOBs. In multiple family ownerships, orthodoxy of doxa is challenged; hence, power struggles and family roles in governance depend on capital possessed by social actors. Practical implications: To continue as a going concern, FOBs must be mindful of traditional, religious sociology of family and regulatory frameworks within the field in which they operate. This is because, without this, the going concern of FOBs becomes suspicious and highly unlikely, especially where there are multiple family ownership and generations. Originality/value: The previous literature predominantly focussed on formal boardroom structures in addressing FOBs' corporate governance issues. Notwithstanding, family governance risk of domineering and distrust associated with traditional and relational governance mechanisms remain under-represented and inconclusive, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. � 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited. en_US
dc.publisher Emerald Publishing en_US
dc.subject Board structure en_US
dc.subject Doxa en_US
dc.subject Ghanaian FOBs en_US
dc.subject Governance structure en_US
dc.subject Governance structures en_US
dc.title Blending traditionalism with legalism: a typology of understanding corporate governance systems in Ghanaian Family-owned businesses (FOBs) from a Bourdieusian perspective en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UEWScholar


Browse

My Account