<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Department of Physics Education</title>
<link href="http://41.74.91.244:8080/handle/123456789/715" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://41.74.91.244:8080/handle/123456789/715</id>
<updated>2026-04-05T20:10:10Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-05T20:10:10Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>status of reflective Teaching practices among Basic School Teachers in Science classroom engagements in Ada East District</title>
<link href="http://41.74.91.244:8080/handle/123456789/4678" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Amevor, A.K.</name>
</author>
<id>http://41.74.91.244:8080/handle/123456789/4678</id>
<updated>2026-02-23T11:00:14Z</updated>
<published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">status of reflective Teaching practices among Basic School Teachers in Science classroom engagements in Ada East District
Amevor, A.K.
Reflective practices are important aspect of professional teaching. This study, sought &#13;
to determine; types of reflective practices, levels of reflectivity, factors influencing &#13;
reflections, and challenges teachers face, implementing reflective practices. &#13;
Quantitative and qualitative designs were used for the study. Basic schools in Ada &#13;
East District were selected to determine the status of reflective practices in the district. &#13;
This will enable documentation for future reference as there appears to be no &#13;
published documentation on the status and quality of reflective practices among basic &#13;
school science teachers. Mixed-methods approach, was employed using both surveys &#13;
and interviews to gather data. In all, 165 basic school science teachers out of 420 were &#13;
randomly sampled. Instruments used were questionnaires, interviews and class &#13;
observations. Data were collected in two phases. Phase one was quantitative phase, &#13;
with closed-ended questionnaires administered, and followed by qualitative phase &#13;
with semi-structured interview guide administered to 20 teachers. An intervention was &#13;
done using the new model. Results of the study indicated that most of the teachers, &#13;
before the intervention, did not understand the concept and the use of reflective &#13;
practice. &#13;
Post-intervention &#13;
workshop, showed improvements in teachers’ &#13;
understanding and practices. Challenges identified were lack of in-service training on &#13;
reflectivity and teacher supervision. The study concludes that basic school teachers’ &#13;
knowledge in reflective practice was low.  Implications of the findings are that in&#13;
service training on reflective practices and supervision have the potential of &#13;
improving teachers’ science classroom engagements. Hence, education authorities and &#13;
stakeholders are encouraged to include reflective practices in their in-service training &#13;
programmes.
A thesis in the Department of Science Education, Faculty &#13;
of Science Education, submitted to the School of  &#13;
Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the  &#13;
requirements for the award of the degree of &#13;
Doctor of Philosophy &#13;
(Science Education)  &#13;
in the University of Education, Winneba
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
